🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.